[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080824192639.587f9391@speedy>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:26:39 -0400
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jarkao2@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, denys@...p.net.lb
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:45:57 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 05:18:41AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > Netem is trying to create packet reordering by requeueing (which is
> > logically like a head insert) instead of enqueueing (which is
> > logically like a tail insert).
>
> Why does it use requeue when tfifo's enqueue will insert this
> at the front of the queue anyway based on time_to_send anyway?
>
> Perhaps it's trying to force reordering when the user replaces
> tfifo with some other qidsc? But that doesn't make sense since
> netem relies on tfifo to implement all the other features such
> as delay and jitter.
>
> So how about
>
> 1) Change netem_graft to disallow the replacement of tfifo;
> 2) Simply use enqueue instead of requeue in netem_enqueue?
>
> Cheers,
Tfifo is there only to add the jitter based reordering. Netem has other
better kinds of reordering as well.
Netem has to be able to put TBF in as a child qdisc. This is how loss
plus rate control is done.
Requeue was the natural way to do this based on the API's available
at the time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists