netdev - Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080824202922.2cc9b9f6@speedy>
Date:	Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:29:22 -0400
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jarkao2@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, denys@...p.net.lb
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:49:47 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:26:39PM -0400, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > Tfifo is there only to add the jitter based reordering. Netem has other
> > better kinds of reordering as well.
> > 
> > Netem has to be able to put TBF in as a child qdisc. This is how loss
> > plus rate control is done.
> 
> What about making TBF a child of tfifo instead? Alternatively
> we could merge tfifo into netem.
> 

But then you couldn't replace tfifo with pfifo or tbf??
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html