netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/15] netdevice: Convert directly reference of netdev->priv to netdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48B4A237.9080606@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:39:19 +0800
From:	Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	NETDEV <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/15] netdevice: Convert directly reference of	netdev->priv
 to netdev_priv()

David Dillow said the following on 2008-8-26 23:46:
> On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 18:12 +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>> Following patches will convert directly reference of netdev->priv to netdev_priv().
>>
>> - Patch 1/15 is the safe convert which I believe will not make "after converted " worse
>> than "before converted".
> 
> When breaking a big patch into multiple messages, please put a diffstat
> for that message above the patch -- and it'd be good to have one in the
> introduction message as well. This lets reviewers take a quick glance
> and see if code they maintain is affected, rather than having to search
> through each message to see what files it touches.
> 

Thanks Dave.
Actually, I goldbricked.
When I split patch-1/15, I didn't make new separated patches,
instead, I just copy them to separated mails, so I lost the
diffstat.

And I will be more diligent next time :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html