netdev - Re: loaded router, excessive getnstimeofday in oprofile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080828.133223.119110675.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rick.jones2@...com
Cc:	jmalicki@...acarta.com, andi@...stfloor.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
	dada1@...mosbay.com, denys@...p.net.lb, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, juhlenko@...mai.com, sammy@...my.net
Subject: Re: loaded router, excessive getnstimeofday in oprofile

From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:29:30 -0700

> Has the request "hit the trading system" when it hits the NIC, or
> when it hits the application executing the trade?  If the SEC calls
> for when it hits the NIC, then none of what is done today is really
> accurate/correct and one would need to start using NIC HW
> timestamps, synchronized with the host and the other NICs in the
> system no?

The SEC isn't mandating anything here, stop framing it that way :-)

People simply won't trade with a firm if they find out that trades
there are executed out of order.

They are simply trying to make things as fair as possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html