[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080902075241.GB4180@ff.dom.local>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:52:41 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, jeff@...zik.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED] [NET-NEXT PATCH 1/2] pkt_sched: Add multiqueue
scheduler support
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 05:54:11AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> OK, but I wonder if it's not enough to treat this as a recommendation?
> Actually, since dequeuing is under the common lock here, the main
> difference seems to be this checking for subqueue_stopped could happen
> a bit earlier,
Hmm.., actually a bit later... Then this should be a bit more exact?!
Anyway, still looks safe to me.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists