netdev - Re: Packet mmap: TX RING and zero copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080902194603.GA2825@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:46:04 +0400
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To:	Johann Baudy <johaahn@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Ulisses Alonso Camaró <uaca@...mni.uv.es>
Subject: Re: Packet mmap: TX RING and zero copy

Hi Johann.

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:27:36PM +0200, Johann Baudy (johaahn@...il.com) wrote:
> I've made lot of tests, playing with jumbo frames, raw sockets, ...
> I've never exceeded ~25Mbytes/s. So I've decided to analyze deeply the
> packet socket transmission process.
> 
> The main blocking point was the memcpy_fromiovec() function that is
> located in the packet_sendmsg() of af_packet.c.

Can you saturate the link with usual tcp/udp socket?

> But, I would like to get as much criticism as possible in order to
> start a discussion with experts about a conceivable way to mix
> zero-copy, sk_buff management and packet socket.
> Which is perhaps impossible with current network kernel flow ...

Did you try vmsplice and splice?
It is the preferred way to do a zero-copy.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html