[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48BDA7AE.3080103@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:53:02 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"jeff@...zik.org" <jeff@...zik.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED] [NET-NEXT PATCH 1/2] pkt_sched: Add multiqueue scheduler
support
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Right. But since this doesn't cause this additional blocking I'm not
> sure there is a reason to forbid this. IMHO documenting this could be
> enough, and letting to do this could be useful even for testing. But,
> of course, you are the author, so I don't persist with this.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek P.
You are correct in that it doesn't cause any additional blocking, but it
does break the way that the prio qdisc is supposed to work. I figure it
is best to keep all the qdiscs behaving the way they are supposed to
without my qdisc changing their behavior by acting as a leaf.
Thanks for all the useful input.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists