[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080902.232627.209816179.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tipc on sparc32
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 22:40:59 -0700
>
> > sparc32 allmodconfig:
> >
> > In file included from net/tipc/link.h:43,
> > from net/tipc/bcast.c:41:
> > net/tipc/node.h:71: error: redefinition of 'struct node'
> >
> > sparc32 likes catching code which uses insufficiently cautiously chosen
> > identifiers. dlm is presently blowing up on sparc32 because it has a
> > to_node() function.
> >
> > Arguably, sparc32 should be fixed, but I'd suggest that random bits of
> > networking code should not be using identifiers as generic-sounding as "node".
>
> I'll fix sparc for the time being, thanks.
Actually, the conflict is between the include/linux/node.h which the
generic device layer uses, and TIPC.
This isn't a sparc specific problem.
And the DLM issue is the same thing.
It might be triggering on sparc32 because linux/node.h gets included
in the tangle of arch and non-arch include files that happen during
the build, but that's benign as far as blaming sparc is concerned.
I can take care of TIPC.
Andrew can you take a stab at DLM?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists