[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080903.022303.84950778.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shanwei@...fujitsu.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ipv6: return with appropriate error code when
sending RH0 using setsockopt()
From: Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:41:06 +0800
> I'm sorry to resend the patch, for that no one replied it from Jun 27.
>
> The kernel had removed the RH0(Type 0 Routing Header), but we can still
> send IPv6 packet with RH0 using sendmsg() or setsockopt().
>
> Compare with sendmsg() that returns EINVAL, but setsockopt() return EPERM.
> The patch fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>
I've tried to defer IPV6 patches that have semantic issues to an
expert such as Yoshifuji-san, but he has dropped off the face of the
planet for a while.
I'll take a look at this if I get a chance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists