[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809041025.15277.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:25:14 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, tomasw@...il.com, yi.zhu@...el.com,
linville@...driver.com, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking
On Thursday, 4 of September 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > What's so hard to understand about this?
> >
> > Here's a simple rule of thumb:
> > - if it's not on the regression list
> > - if it's not a reported security hole
> > - if it's not on the reported oopses list
> > then why are people sending it to me?
> >
> > IOW, if it's just another random improvement, and you send it to me
> > outside of the merge window, then what is the point of the merge window?
>
> This is exactly what I've been trying to tell the Intel wireless folks
> but they refuse to listen.
>
> I just won't take their stuff until they get their act in gear.
>
> No problem.
BTW, there are two regression fixes for forcedeth:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121917167232014&w=4
that fix the regressions tracked as:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11358
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11361
respectively and both are more than 2 weeks old now.
Is there any chance to push them upstream or is there anything wrong with them?
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists