[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1220634383.6430.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:06:23 -0400
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
NETDEV <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] netdevice airo: Convert directly reference of
netdev->priv to netdev->ml_priv
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 08:50 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:27:39AM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
> > We have some reasons to kill netdev->priv:
> > 1. netdev->priv is equal to netdev_priv().
> > 2. netdev_priv() wraps the calculation of netdev->priv's offset, obviously
> > netdev_priv() is more flexible than netdev->priv.
> > But we cann't kill netdev->priv, because so many drivers reference to it
> > directly.
> >
> > OK, becasue Dave S. Miller said, "every direct netdev->priv usage is a bug",
> > and I want to kill netdev->priv later, I decided to convert all the direct
> > reference of netdev->priv first.
> >
> > Different to readonly reference of netdev->priv, in this driver, netdev->priv
> > was changed. I use netdev->ml_priv to replace netdev->priv.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
>
> Thank you for your patch. However, I do not understand why you didn't
> simply replace netdev->priv with netdev_priv()? Can you explain?
Yeah, that would have been my first choice too...
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists