[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4845fc0809050402x5552f526pc8511026d7faa359@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:02:44 +0200
From: "Julius Volz" <juliusv@...gle.com>
To: "Simon Horman" <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
"Malcolm Turnbull" <malcolm@...dbalancer.org>,
"Siim Põder" <siim@...rad-teel.net>,
"Vince Busam" <vbusam@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipvs: load balance IPv4 connections from a local process
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> @@ -1244,11 +1278,12 @@ ip_vs_in(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk
> ip_vs_fill_iphdr(af, skb_network_header(skb), &iph);
>
> /*
> - * Big tappo: only PACKET_HOST (neither loopback nor mcasts)
> - * ... don't know why 1st test DOES NOT include 2nd (?)
> + * Big tappo: only PACKET_HOST, including loopback for local client
> + * Don't handle local packets on IPv6 for now
> */
> - if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type != PACKET_HOST
> - || skb->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK || skb->sk)) {
> + if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type != PACKET_HOST ||
> + (af == AF_INET6 || (skb->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK ||
> + skb->sk)))) {
Hm, shouldn't this be (af == AF_INET6 && ...) instead of "||"? The
current expression just NF_ACCEPTs _any_ incoming IPv6 packets, even
non-local ones.
Julius
--
Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps
Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists