lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:34:39 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
CC:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/25] netns ct: per-netns event cache

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 06:58:38PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> adobriyan@...il.com wrote:
>>>  static inline void
>>> -nf_conntrack_event_cache(enum ip_conntrack_events event,
>>> +nf_conntrack_event_cache(struct net *net, enum ip_conntrack_events event,
>>>  			 const struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>  {
>> Passing the conntrack instead of the struct net and the skb
>> would probably keep the callers cleaner.
> 
> Dunno, passing netns explicitly like saying conntrack event happened in
> netns A, which is reasonable. OTOH, s/skb/ct/ is indeed nicer.
> 
> I'll change it as you suggest and see what happens.
> 
> BTW, I asked earlier if untracked conntracks are ever supposed to drop into
> event cache. If they're, trimming nf_conntrack_untracked is out of question.

No, they are skipped by the only event handler, ctnetlink.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists