netdev - Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809050908160.17569@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:08:50 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
cc:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns


On Friday 2008-09-05 08:25, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> > I hope so :) A different possiblity suggest by Pablo some time ago
>> > would be to mark untracked packets in skb->nfctinfo and not
>> > attach a conntrack at all.
>> 
>> Indeed, I remember that :). I left that patch of the table time ago [1].
>> There's a nf_reset call missing as Patrick said at that time. I can
>> recover it if you like the idea.
>
> I think that would be a good idea.

Would that work? Right now, a ct==NULL indicates the 'INVALID' state,
and overloading it with 'UNTRACKED' does not seem nice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html