| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7e0dd21a0809050629w7fa8a914i863faa9ac18c3be4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:29:25 +0200 From: "Johann Baudy" <johaahn@...il.com> To: "Evgeniy Polyakov" <johnpol@....mipt.ru> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Packet mmap: TX RING and zero copy Hi Evegniy > Yes, and we found, that vmsplice() is slow, so unacceptible. > What about single big enough file being sent via sendfile()? > Can it saturate the link in your setup? I'm trying to. But so far not able to saturate the link. > > It looks like you are sending data in chunks, which you should not do. > Why do you splice input file into 60k chunks for UDP? > sendfile() should iterate over whole file in page chunks, pack them > into splice buffer (16 pages), send them, then get next set of pages > and so on... udp_sendpage() will properly allocate skbs for the given > MTU, or append data to the end of the skb if there is a place. > > You should _not_ manually interrupt this process and call sendfile() > multiple times with different offsets and small sizes. > So, it seems that there is something wrong in UDP here, because TCP works properly with same code. If size argument of sendfile() exceed 61440, sendfile() returns 61440 and send no data to the device ... I will try to investigate it but for my app sendfile() is not conceivable. Only vmsplice could, but too slow. Thanks, Johann -- Johann Baudy johaahn@...il.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists