netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipvs: load balance ipv6 connections from a local process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f4845fc0809060226g4ee00f4fs210ba76309130be7@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 6 Sep 2008 11:26:29 +0200
From:	"Julius Volz" <juliusv@...gle.com>
To:	"Simon Horman" <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Malcolm Turnbull" <malcolm@...dbalancer.org>,
	"Siim Põder" <siim@...rad-teel.net>,
	"Vince Busam" <vbusam@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipvs: load balance ipv6 connections from a local process

On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:40:31PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just some minor things:
>
> Hi Julius,
>
> thanks for pointing these out. I will send patches to fix these problems ASAP.

Thanks, looking good!

> More generally speaking, sorry to all parties concerned for applying
> these two patches a little prematurely. At this stage I'd rather move
> forward rather than roll the tree back. But I am happy to discuss this.

Probably better to just go forward when the tree is already public?

Julius

-- 
Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps

Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html