[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080908234028.GF13048@verge.net.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:40:29 +1000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Siim Põder <siim@...rad-teel.net>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@...dbalancer.org>,
Julius Volz <juliusv@...gle.com>,
Vince Busam <vbusam@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 12:04:20PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The impetus for this series of patches is Julian Anastasov noting
> that "load balance IPv4 connections from a local process" checks
> for 0 TCP checksums. Herbert Xu confirmed that this is not legal,
> even on loopback traffic, but that rather partial checksums are
> possible.
>
> The first patch in this series is a proposed solution to handle
> partial checksums for both TCP and UDP.
>
> The other two patches clean things up a bit.
>
> I have not tested this code beyond compilation yet.
After extensive testing by Julius Volz and limited testing by myself, I
have applied the first patch, which does indeed allow packets with
PARTIAL_CHECKSUM to work, to lvs-next-2.6. I have dropped the second two
patches which produce bogus checksums.
I will revisit the second to patches at some point and try and produce
versions that work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists