lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080908095403.GA14746@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:54:04 +1000
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Siim Põder <siim@...rad-teel.net>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@...dbalancer.org>,
	Julius Volz <juliusv@...gle.com>,
	Vince Busam <vbusam@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc 1/3] ipvs: handle PARTIAL_CHECKSUM

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 07:05:27PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> If cp->app is not present, then only the destiantion IP address
> and possibly port will have been altered. If it is present,
> then other parts of the packet may also have been altered.

Right, when cp->app is present, and we're using partial checksums,
you don't need to update anything apart from the IP address because
the hardware will compute the checksum later.

Thanks for the explanation!

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ