[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e0dd21a0809080601lc250197wde17733522d03125@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:01:04 +0200
From: "Johann Baudy" <johaahn@...il.com>
To: "Evgeniy Polyakov" <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Packet mmap: TX RING and zero copy
Hi Evgeniy,
> Are you sure that it is udp_push_pending_frames() and not some splice
> waiting?
>
No, I'm not sure.
Are there any queue or allocator limits that can slow the bitrate
through this function?
I mean something that will need end of transfer to start a new one.
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -743,7 +743,29 @@ int udp_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page
*page, int offset,
size_t size, int flags)
{
struct udp_sock *up = udp_sk(sk);
+ struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
int ret;
+ int mtu, fragheaderlen;
+ struct ip_options *opt = NULL;
+
+ lock_sock(sk);
+ mtu = inet->cork.fragsize;
+
+ if (inet->cork.flags & IPCORK_OPT)
+ opt = inet->cork.opt;
+
+ fragheaderlen = sizeof(struct iphdr) + (opt ? opt->optlen : 0);
+
+ // With UDP fragmentation
+ if (inet->cork.length + size >= 0xFFFF - fragheaderlen) {
+ // Without UDP fragmentation
+ // if( (inet->cork.length + size) > mtu) {
+ ret = udp_push_pending_frames(sk);
+ if (ret) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+ release_sock(sk);
if (!up->pending) {
struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = flags|MSG_MORE };
Please find above, patch with your rectifications.
Do we must use MTU limit instead offset limit? As you said that UDP
split over IP must be avoided.
If yes, can I force size value forwarded to ip_append_page() in order
to fill the whole packet? Or this will not be handled properly by all
callers?
Thanks in advance,
Johann
--
Johann Baudy
johaahn@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists