[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dffc28000809110122ke4cbef6j1800dd29fef1e5ad@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:22:10 +0200
From: "Zsolt SZALAI" <zs.szalai@...il.com>
To: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [IPSEC] confused about IPSEC_MANUAL_REQID_MAX
Thanks,
I would like to switch, but it would require much time to port our
code, that we don't have now.
I hope af_key wont be deleted from the kernel tree in the near future,
and then we will have time to migrate.
BR,
Szalai Zsolt
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Zsolt SZALAI <zs.szalai@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> As XFRM allows, is it safe to increase this value or even bypass the
>> checking of the reqid beeing higher than that?
>
> Please stop using the af_key interface. The part dealing with
> policies (which is the only place where reqids are generated) is
> just as unportable as xfrm.
>
> In any case changing an interface should be avoided unless there
> is a really good reason. In this case I don't see any good reasons
> since you can instead switch to xfrm.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
> Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
> PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists