netdev - Re: [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Fix qdisc_watchdog() vs. dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jarkao2@...il.com
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Fix qdisc_watchdog() vs.
 dev_deactivate() race

From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:02:49 +0000

> Alas I'm still not sure how this whole peek idea is going to be
> implemented (dequeuing after peeking doesn't have to give us the
> same skb since in the meantime e.g. in HTB some other class with
> higher prio can get enough tokens etc., and if there is a break
> for transmit in the meantime with possible enqueuing, or we can
> deal with something like sch_multiq, which depends on the current
> state of the tx_queues, this all looks even more interesting).

That's a good point.

Well, once that is discussed and resolved, at least the patch I
posted can be used as a base for implementation :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html