[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48CC1136.2090005@garzik.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:15:02 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
chrisl@...are.com, arvidjaar@...l.ru,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
pratap@...are.com, zach@...are.com
Subject: Re: [patch for 2.6.27? 4/4] e1000e: prevent corruption of EEPROM/NVM
Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>> From: Christopher Li <chrisl@...are.com>
>>
>> Andrey reports e1000e corruption, and that a patch in vmware's ESX
>> fixed
>> it.
>>
>> The EEPROM corruption is triggered by concurrent access of the EEPROM
>> read/write. Putting a lock around it solve the problem.
>>
>
> NAK. Please do not apply this patch, for reasons mentioned in my other
> reply just sent to netdev.
>
> The RTNL should be preventing this from being a possible bug in *Linux*
> and if it is not we have much larger problems, not the least of which is
> that this patch doesn't lock against the driver accessing the eeprom
> simultaneously.
Ping. A problem still occurs, regardless of what should be prevented?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists