[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080916112411.062fa615@tux>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:24:11 -0300
From: Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, thomas.jarosch@...ra2net.com,
billfink@...dspring.com, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Patrick Hardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp FRTO: in-order-only "TCP proxy" fragility
workaround
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:10:33 +0300 (EEST)
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> wrote:
> Only thing I know to ask is, do you have any idea if your ntpd is
> hard-stepping the time instead of adjusting the clock's rate a bit (the
> latter should keep the clock monotonious besides potential bugs)?
I assume it's adjusting the clock's rate a bit. Anyway, it's a
pretty simple config:
fraga@...eporto ~$ cat /etc/ntp.conf
server ntp.usp.br
server ntp.nasa.gov
driftfile /etc/ntp.drift
And ntpd is running without any special parameters.
The log messages are as simple as:
Sep 15 03:56:04 teleporto ntpd[2301]: frequency initialized 5.891 PPM from /etc/ntp.drift
Sep 15 03:59:25 teleporto ntpd[2304]: frequency initialized 5.891 PPM from /etc/ntp.drift
Sep 15 04:03:49 teleporto ntpd[2304]: synchronized to 143.107.255.15, stratum 2
Sep 15 04:03:49 teleporto ntpd[2304]: kernel time sync status change 0001
Sep 15 04:10:16 teleporto ntpd[2304]: synchronized to 198.123.30.132, stratum 1
Sep 15 04:11:58 teleporto ntpd[2301]: frequency initialized 5.891 PPM from /etc/ntp.drift
Sep 15 04:16:18 teleporto ntpd[2301]: synchronized to 198.123.30.132, stratum 1
Sep 15 04:16:18 teleporto ntpd[2301]: kernel time sync status change 0001
Sep 15 12:08:53 teleporto ntpd[2301]: kernel time sync status change 4001
Sep 15 12:34:31 teleporto ntpd[2301]: kernel time sync status change 0001
Sep 15 14:34:06 teleporto ntpd[2301]: kernel time sync status change 4001
Sep 15 14:51:12 teleporto ntpd[2301]: kernel time sync status change 0001
If I understood correctly what do you mean, ntpd adjusts nicely the time to not
cause huge differences in the time.
And we're reaching the conclusion that the timer code from 2.6.25 and above
have something wrong, since 2.6.24 and below is ok, which causes those stalls.
But I'll wait some more time to confirm this, although I'm almost sure it's a timer
related bug which has this colateral effect of stalling connections.
And just a question: do you use ntpd on your own desktop?
Thank you!
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists