netdev - Re: Adding SNAT support to LVS/NAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:38:31 +0200
From:	"Julius Volz" <juliusv@...gle.com>
To:	"Joseph Mack NA3T" <jmack@...d.net>
Cc:	"Simon Horman" <horms@...ge.net.au>, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, j.stubbs@...kthink.co.jp,
	"Siim Põder" <siim@...rad-teel.net>,
	"Vince Busam" <vbusam@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Adding SNAT support to LVS/NAT

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@...d.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Julius Volz wrote:
>
>> Amazingly, the first SYN and the SYN/ACK of a TCP connection to the
>> VIP:vport do not traverse the NAT chain in POSTROUTING at all
>
> :-(
>
>> (verified by LOG target),
>
> you didn't see the packets in the logs?

Exactly. No matter what I do, only the ACK in response to the SYN/ACK
appears in the logs. With SNAT without IPVS, the SYN packet correctly
enters the chain/table.

I haven't found anything in the IPVS or Netfilter code yet that could
cause this problem...

Julius

-- 
Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps

Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html