netdev - Re: Should we move IPVS out of net/ipv4 now?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f4845fc0809181304y25e3df07xfde0f23406b519a2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:04:28 +0200
From:	"Julius Volz" <juliusv@...gle.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	csnook@...hat.com, horms@...ge.net.au, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Should we move IPVS out of net/ipv4 now?

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:37:33 -0400
>
>> Julius Volz wrote:
>> > Since IPVS now does partial IPv6, should we finally move it from
>> > "net/ipv4/ipvs" to "net" or to "net/netfilter"? I posted that patch a
>> > long time ago, but that was before any of the actual v6 features, so
>> > there was probably no interest.
>>
>> Whatever the netfilter people want is fine with me.
>
> I think, especially in the long term, putting IPVS under net/netfilter/
> is the right thing to do.

Ok thanks, I'll send the patch for that once lvs-next-2.6 or
net-next-2.6 builds for ARCH=um again (there seems to be some breakage
at the moment)...

Julius

-- 
Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps

Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html