[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D3A381.1080500@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:05:05 +0200
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
CC: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Edward Hsu <edward_hsu@...ltek.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: read MAC address from EEPROM on init
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>> + * is always consecutive 4-byte data starting from the VPD address
>> + * specified."
>> + */
>> + if (rtl_eeprom_read(tp->pci_dev, vpd_cap, 0x000e, &low) < 0 ||
>> + rtl_eeprom_read(tp->pci_dev, vpd_cap, 0x0012, &high) < 0) {
>> + dprintk("Reading MAC address from EEPROM failed\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Mask hi-word */
>> + high &= 0xffff;
>
> ..Hmm, and besides fixing sparse printouts, this looks like a real
> endianness bug.
Yes it is, my mistake. The patch below will be better.
---
drivers/net/r8169.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
index befc927..cff8dd6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c
@@ -1910,6 +1910,75 @@ static void rtl_disable_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct rtl8169_private *tp)
}
}
+static int rtl_eeprom_read(struct pci_dev *pdev, int cap, int addr, __le32 *val)
+{
+ int ret, count = 100;
+ u16 status = 0;
+ u32 value;
+
+ ret = pci_write_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_VPD_ADDR, addr);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ do {
+ udelay(10);
+ ret = pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_VPD_ADDR, &status);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ } while (!(status & PCI_VPD_ADDR_F) && --count);
+
+ if (!(status & PCI_VPD_ADDR_F))
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+ ret = pci_read_config_dword(pdev, cap + PCI_VPD_DATA, &value);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ *val = cpu_to_le32(value);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void rtl_init_mac_address(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
+ void __iomem *ioaddr)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = tp->pci_dev;
+ u8 cfg1;
+ int vpd_cap;
+ u8 mac[8];
+
+ cfg1 = RTL_R8(Config1);
+ if (!(cfg1 & VPD)) {
+ dprintk("VPD access not enabled, enabling\n");
+ RTL_W8(Cfg9346, Cfg9346_Unlock);
+ RTL_W8(Config1, cfg1 | VPD);
+ RTL_W8(Cfg9346, Cfg9346_Lock);
+ }
+
+ vpd_cap = pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_VPD);
+ if (!vpd_cap)
+ return;
+
+ /* MAC address is stored in EEPROM at offset 0x0e
+ * Realtek says: "The VPD address does not have to be a DWORD-aligned
+ * address as defined in the PCI 2.2 Specifications, but the VPD data
+ * is always consecutive 4-byte data starting from the VPD address
+ * specified."
+ */
+ if (rtl_eeprom_read(pdev, vpd_cap, 0x000e, (__le32*)&mac[0]) < 0 ||
+ rtl_eeprom_read(pdev, vpd_cap, 0x0012, (__le32*)&mac[4]) < 0) {
+ dprintk("Reading MAC address from EEPROM failed\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ dprintk("MAC address found in EEPROM: "
+ "%2.2x:%2.2x:%2.2x:%2.2x:%2.2x:%2.2x\n",
+ mac[0], mac[1], mac[2], mac[3], mac[4], mac[5], mac[6]);
+
+ /* Write MAC address */
+ rtl_rar_set(tp, mac);
+}
+
static int __devinit
rtl8169_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
{
@@ -2079,7 +2148,10 @@ rtl8169_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
dev->do_ioctl = rtl8169_ioctl;
}
- /* Get MAC address. FIXME: read EEPROM */
+ /* Read MAC address from EEPROM */
+ rtl_init_mac_address(tp, ioaddr);
+
+ /* Get MAC address */
for (i = 0; i < MAC_ADDR_LEN; i++)
dev->dev_addr[i] = RTL_R8(MAC0 + i);
memcpy(dev->perm_addr, dev->dev_addr, dev->addr_len);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists