netdev - Re: patchwork for netdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809181712330.18136@shark.he.net>
Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	rdunlap@...otime.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
	linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: patchwork for netdev

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:

> From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > > I was hoping those ACK emails would be one of the things I could stop
> > > doing if patchwork is effective.  Not immediately, but eventually.
> > 
> > Well, that's a reasonable goal.  OTOH, if everyone wants to know
> > if their patch was applied, then having 50 people look at a web page
> > (or at a git tree) is more total overhead than one person generating
> > an email.  IMHO.  But maybe it depends on which side is being optimized.
> 
> If the choke point is me, which it is, then...

then you get to choose, I suppose.  Meaning look at the patchwork
queue, which I did, and it looks good.

-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html