netdev - [PATCH net-next 02/15] tcp: move tcp_verify_retransmit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1221933153-11874-3-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date:	Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:52:20 +0300
From:	"Ilpo JÃ¤rvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 02/15] tcp: move tcp_verify_retransmit_hint

Signed-off-by: Ilpo JÃ¤rvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |   26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 7306bfb..9e95ad6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -979,6 +979,19 @@ static void tcp_update_reordering(struct sock *sk, const int metric,
 	}
 }
 
+/* RFC: This is from the original, I doubt that this is necessary at all:
+ * clear xmit_retrans hint if seq of this skb is beyond hint. How could we
+ * retransmitted past LOST markings in the first place? I'm not fully sure
+ * about undo and end of connection cases, which can cause R without L?
+ */
+static void tcp_verify_retransmit_hint(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	if ((tp->retransmit_skb_hint != NULL) &&
+	    before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq,
+		   TCP_SKB_CB(tp->retransmit_skb_hint)->seq))
+		tp->retransmit_skb_hint = NULL;
+}
+
 /* This procedure tags the retransmission queue when SACKs arrive.
  *
  * We have three tag bits: SACKED(S), RETRANS(R) and LOST(L).
@@ -2156,19 +2169,6 @@ static int tcp_time_to_recover(struct sock *sk)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/* RFC: This is from the original, I doubt that this is necessary at all:
- * clear xmit_retrans hint if seq of this skb is beyond hint. How could we
- * retransmitted past LOST markings in the first place? I'm not fully sure
- * about undo and end of connection cases, which can cause R without L?
- */
-static void tcp_verify_retransmit_hint(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct sk_buff *skb)
-{
-	if ((tp->retransmit_skb_hint != NULL) &&
-	    before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq,
-		   TCP_SKB_CB(tp->retransmit_skb_hint)->seq))
-		tp->retransmit_skb_hint = NULL;
-}
-
 /* Mark head of queue up as lost. With RFC3517 SACK, the packets is
  * is against sacked "cnt", otherwise it's against facked "cnt"
  */
-- 
1.5.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html