netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48D6104B.9040304@superbug.co.uk>
Date:	Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:13:47 +0100
From:	James Courtier-Dutton <James@...erbug.co.uk>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dwalker@...sta.com,
	arjan@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure.

Herbert Xu wrote:
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> receive using multiple RX queues and MSI-X interrupts.  It's
>> also for things like IPSEC where the per-packet cpu usage
>> is so huge (to do the crypto) that it makes sense to even
>> split up the work to multiple cpus within the same flow.
> 
> Unfortunately doing this with IPsec is going to be non-trivial
> since we still want to maintain packet ordering inside IPsec
> and you don't get the inner flow information until you decrypt
> the packet.
> 

Why do you have to preserve packet ordering?
TCP/IP does not preserve packet ordering across the network.
IPSEC uses a sliding window for anti-relay detection precisely because
it has to be able to handle out-of-order packets.

Sharing the sliding window between CPUs might be interesting!

James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html