[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080921141451.77a7172c@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:14:51 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ipw2100-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhu@...el.com,
reinette.chatre@...el.com, jgarzik@...ox.com,
linville@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware
restart.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:05:55 +0400
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:02:03PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven
> (arjan@...radead.org) wrote:
> > > That allows to dump whatever number of warnings you want. The
> > > more we have, the louder will be customers scream.
> >
> > artificially increasing numbers isn't going to do that; it just
> > shows you're more interested in making a stink than in getting
> > something improved ;(
>
> As practice shows, I'm the only one who is interested in getting
> something improved, and Intel, as we see right now, is not interested
> in it at all, since you ask me not only decrease error verbosity, but
> also do not work towards fixing the bug by trying to understand where
> it lives.
I did no such thing and you know it.
I'm sorry, I'm not going to waste time on this if you keep acting
this dishonest; welcome to my mail filter...
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists