netdev - Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080922.034933.119934091.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2008 03:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	csnook@...hat.com
Cc:	andi@...stfloor.org, rick.jones2@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:59:34 -0700 (PDT)

> 
> Still waiting for your test program and example traces Chris.
> 
> Until I see that there really isn't anything more I can contribute
> concretely to this discussion.

Ping, still waiting for this...  Can you provide the test case,
perhaps sometime this year? :-)

I'll try to figure out why Andi's patch doesn't behave as expected.
I suspect you may have a bum build if the sysctl values are coming
up as zero as that's completely impossible as far as I can tell.

If something so fundamental as that isn't behaving properly, all
bets are off for anything else you try to use when having that
patch applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html