[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080923.164745.12711639.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jkosina@...e.cz
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jeff@...zik.org, mingo@...e.hu,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
bruce.w.allan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] e1000e: Useset_memory_ro()/set_memory_rw() to
protect flash memory
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:45:53 +0200 (CEST)
> Yes, probably not a vanilla kernel material, but could be very well used
> for testing to further isolate whether it is kernel or userspace
> corrupting the memory mapped eeprom.
Absolutely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists