lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080923070133.GB26836@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:01:33 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, johaahn@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sendfile() and UDP socket

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:27:10AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:54:27PM +0800, Herbert Xu (herbert@...dor.apana.org.au) wrote:
> > I think this dicussion is moot since the only time you want to use
> > sendfile is for bulk transfers and these days anybody designing new
> > applications that does bulk transfers over UDP should be taken out
> > and shot.
> 
> One can protect himself pointing how slow may be memory bus in some
> hardware setup, which completely does not allow to perform any copy.

Yes but bulk transfers over UDP is a bad idea regardless of how
slow your bus is :)

So what application needs this?

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ