lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:36:05 +0400 From: Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@...telecom.ru> To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Machine Check Exception Re: NetDev! Please help! > 2) Non-default qdiscs (any qdiscs added with tc): there is only one > root qdisc (with its tree) as before, dequeued to all tx queues (if > available). Since there is only one qdisc lock, and additional flag > preventing other processes to run the qdisc at the same time, there > is not so much advantage of SMP, except on tx locking. All previous > tc configs should work without changes (except sch_prio and sch_rr > used for multiqueuing, replaced by sch_multiq and act_skbedit now). > Probably in some cases adding sch_multiq to a tree for separating > qdisc queues per tx queues could be useful. > Very thanks for detailed information! Yeh! Its sound great for me. I also can stress test this feature in our network if you will needed it. Only i have 2 question ... 1. If kernel use default situation (no tc user create rules, simple autocreate by network card driver/module) its will normal work with traffic what must delivered "as is" (not shape)... like IPTV or other multicast/unicast video stream... If i understand logic we have 8 cpu/core and 4 TX queue and 4 RX... one cpu linked to 1 TX/RX.... but if 1 cpu is burned by some process - this cpu will send its packet later when other cpu and packet is shape... but streams must go packet by packet to receive device... I understand that it simple need use hash function for TX queue, but if i understand - RX can't separate packets to different queues (its doing by hardware?) by hash function and packets may shape in rx stage because one CPU get it letter when nedded? I do not wish to spend your time... only say if it will work normal by default and i will sleep easy :) 2. I can locate module like sch_multiq at last 2.6.27-rc tree and not have information of it in google... I need to know only one thing - what params for hashing was planned for it? Thanks and thanks again! And again sorry for my English. Best regals, Badalyan Vyacheslav. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists