[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFF76F11EC.DE83396F-ON882574CE.00619859-882574CE.00622571@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:52:03 -0700
From: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@...core.fi>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /proc/net/igmp group address encoding
netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org wrote on 09/24/2008 04:20:48 AM:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Pekka Savola wrote:
> > [psavola@...ps ~]$ more /proc/net/igmp
> > Idx Device : Count Querier Group Users Timer Reporter
> > 1 lo : 0 V3
> > 010000E0 1 0:00000000 0
> > 2 eth0 : 2 V3
> > 010000E0 1 0:00000000 0
> > 3 wmaster0 : 3 V3
> > 010000E0 1 0:00000000 0
> > 4 wlan0 : 3 V3
> > 010000E0 1 0:00000000 0
> >
> > (The header and the fields seem to be a little off in the output..)
> >
> > [psavola@...ps ~]$ netstat -gn | grep eth0
> > eth0 1 224.0.0.1
> > eth0 1 ff02::1
>
> Another observation here: the "Count" field appears to correspond to
> 'netstat -gn | wc -l' output. But this includes both IPv4 and IPv6
> groups. Is this intentional? Shouldn't this only count the v4
> entries, just like /proc/net/igmp6 only includes v6 entries?
I'm guessing this is Alan Cox's code, but it's at least 8 years
old, so I'm not sure original intent is easy to establish. :-)
I agree it'd be a good idea to separate the counts. Are you
planning to do a patch?
+-DLS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists