netdev - Re: AIM9 regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:10:54 -0500
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AIM9 regression

Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> These loopback benchmarks are often more sensitive to scheduler than networking
> changes.

Just ran a test with real NICs which show the same issues. I guess I need to
get familiar with the network stack and start hacking on it. Sigh.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html