[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080924005335.0117c536.billfink@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:53:35 -0400
From: Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>, davem@...emloft.net,
johaahn@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sendfile() and UDP socket
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:27:10AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:54:27PM +0800, Herbert Xu (herbert@...dor.apana.org.au) wrote:
> > > I think this dicussion is moot since the only time you want to use
> > > sendfile is for bulk transfers and these days anybody designing new
> > > applications that does bulk transfers over UDP should be taken out
> > > and shot.
> >
> > One can protect himself pointing how slow may be memory bus in some
> > hardware setup, which completely does not allow to perform any copy.
>
> Yes but bulk transfers over UDP is a bad idea regardless of how
> slow your bus is :)
>
> So what application needs this?
It seems it might be useful for a video server. The one thing that
seems to be missing from the sendfile() semantics is a message size
to be used for splitting the file into UDP datagrams, but this could
be provided by a separate ioctl(), and could default to the largest
message size that would fit in the MTU.
-Bill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists