[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1222875500.7492.6.camel@este>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:38:20 +0200
From: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@....bme.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 10/16] Don't lookup the socket if there's a socket
attached to the skb
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 07:50 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@....bme.hu>
> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:24:31 +0200
>
> > Use the socket cached in the TPROXY target if it's present.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@....bme.hu>
>
> Ok, this starts to get into controversial territory.
> :-)
>
> At the very least I think:
>
> 1) We should do this unconditionally, and even put
> a "unlikely" there in the test.
>
> 2) Actually, the whole operation belongs in a generic
> net/sock.h helper function, and this includes the
> leading if() test.
The problem is that if you include the if() test then you have to
include the lookup call as well and that's different for TCP/UDP.
Of course we could create a generic helper that then calls the
appropriate lookup function but that's also an unnecessary extra branch,
isn't it?
--
KOVACS Krisztian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists