netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v6 02/16] selinux: Correctly handle IPv4 packets on IPv6 sockets in all cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200810011237.44688.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:37:44 -0400
From:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 02/16] selinux: Correctly handle IPv4 packets on IPv6 sockets in all cases

On Tuesday 30 September 2008 9:36:57 pm James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Paul Moore wrote:
> > We did the right thing in a few cases but there were several areas
> > where we determined a packet's address family based on the socket's
> > address family which is not the right thing to do since we can get
> > IPv4 packets on IPv6 sockets. This patch fixes these problems by
> > either taking the address family directly from the packet.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
>
> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>

Thanks for taking the time to review and comment on the patches, again.  
I'm adding all of your acks/review to the patches and will post an 
updated patchset once I've had the chance to sanity check the fixes.

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html