netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] Phonet: declare headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081001.013213.193713776.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Phonet: declare headers

From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:54:52 +0300

> While we're on if_phonet.h, I also wonder what the "right" place for 
> phonet_header_ops is... Currently in phonet.ko, any network device driver 
> link-depends on the socket stack :-( for two tiny little header_ops 
> callbacks. Is that OK? or should it go to core like the Ethernet ops, or be 
> inline'd?

The drivers are kind of useless without the socket layer
so it doesn't seem so awful to have this dependency.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html