netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v6 04/16] selinux: Better local/forward check in selinux_ip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0810011141180.5277@tundra.namei.org>
Date:	Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:43:12 +1000 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
cc:	selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 04/16] selinux: Better local/forward check in
 selinux_ip_postroute()

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Paul Moore wrote:

> It turns out that checking to see if skb->sk is NULL is not a very good
> indicator of a forwarded packet as some locally generated packets also have
> skb->sk set to NULL.  Fix this by not only checking the skb->sk field but also
> the IP[6]CB(skb)->flags field for the IP[6]SKB_FORWARDED flag.  While we are
> at it, we are calling selinux_parse_skb() much earlier than we really should
> resulting in potentially wasted cycles parsing packets for information we
> might no use; so shuffle the code around a bit to fix this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>

Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>

(Wow, this code is getting complex... :-)


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html