netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] [RFC] netns: enable cross-ve Unix sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48E36FDA.5090808@openvz.org>
Date:	Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:40:58 +0400
From:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	benjamin.thery@...l.net, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	Denis Lunev <den@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] [RFC] netns: enable cross-ve Unix sockets

Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>> So there are 2 cases:
>>>   * full isolation : restriction on VPS
>>>   * partial isolation : no restriction but *perhaps* problem when migrating
>>>
>>> Looks like we need an option per namespace to reduce the isolation for 
>>> af_unix sockets :)
>>>   - on (default): current behaviour => full isolation
>>>   - off : partial isolation
>> You mean some sysctl, that enables/disables this check in unix_find_socket_byinode?
> 
> Yes.

OK. Den, please, do :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html