[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810030812570.3230@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, airlied@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.27-rc8 5/6] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> The debugging message is racy anyway with respect to accessing nvm_owner,
> right? It should be done after the mutex has been succesfully acquired.
It's done that way on purpose - to see who _could_ be racing.
After the mutex, it could never trigger, because the mutex is the thing
that guarantees non-racy-ness.
IOW, it's a debugging message just to see that the old bug (the "before
the fix") really did happen. We can/will remove it, but I think people are
still looking at the e1000e driver and probably want to see the paths that
can cause problems.
Of course, it's entirely possible that we should remove it in mainline
already, and just let the people inside intel/suse/xyzzy who are trying to
reproduce it have it.
Jesse? Thomas?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists