[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48EA8197.6080502@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:22:31 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: minyard@....org
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU
Corey Minyard a écrit :
> Change the UDP hash lock from an rwlock to RCU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
> ---
> include/net/udp.h | 9 +++++----
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> net/ipv6/udp.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/udp.h b/include/net/udp.h
> index addcdc6..35aa104 100644
> --- a/include/net/udp.h
> +++ b/include/net/udp.h
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct udp_skb_cb {
> #define UDP_SKB_CB(__skb) ((struct udp_skb_cb *)((__skb)->cb))
>
> extern struct hlist_head udp_hash[UDP_HTABLE_SIZE];
> -extern rwlock_t udp_hash_lock;
> +extern spinlock_t udp_hash_wlock;
>
>
> /* Note: this must match 'valbool' in sock_setsockopt */
> @@ -112,12 +112,13 @@ static inline void udp_lib_hash(struct sock *sk)
>
> static inline void udp_lib_unhash(struct sock *sk)
> {
> - write_lock_bh(&udp_hash_lock);
> - if (sk_del_node_init(sk)) {
> + spin_lock_bh(&udp_hash_wlock);
> + if (sk_del_node_init_rcu(sk)) {
> inet_sk(sk)->num = 0;
> sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1);
> }
> - write_unlock_bh(&udp_hash_lock);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&udp_hash_wlock);
> + synchronize_rcu();
UDP central rwlock can hurt performance, because of cache line ping pong,
so your patch really makes sense.
Me wondering what impact this synchronize_rcu() can have on mono-threaded
VOIP applications using lot of UDP sockets. What is the maximum delay of
this function ?
For "struct file" freeing, we chose call_rcu() instead of synchronize_rcu()
Maybe we could add a generic rcu head to struct sock, and use call_rcu() in
sk_prot_free() for sockets needing RCU (udp after your patch is applied, maybe
tcp on future patches, while I believe previous work on the subject concluded
RCU was not giving good results for short lived http sessions) ?
Or just add SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to slab creation in proto_register()
for "struct proto udp_prot/udpv6_prot" so that kmem_cache_free()
done in sk_prot_free() can defer freeing to RCU...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists