netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m37i8k3hv1.fsf@ursa.amorsen.dk>
Date:	Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:54:42 +0200
From:	Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, minyard@....org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	shemminger@...tta.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU

Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> writes:

> Most UDP sockets are setup for long periods (RTP trafic), or if an application really
> wants to {open/send or receive one UDP frame/close} many sockets, it already hits
> RCU handling of its file structures and should not be slowed down that much.
>
> By 'long period' I mean thousand of packets sent/received by each RTP session, being
> voice (50 packets/second) or even worse video...

Does DNS with port randomization need short lived sockets?


/Benny

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html