netdev - Re: [PATCH] bonding: send IPv6 neighbor advertisement on failover

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OF4E8F44F8.B83D3AFA-ON882574DC.006B0778-882574DC.006C2639@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:41:16 -0700
From:	David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Cc:	Alex Sidorenko <alexandre.sidorenko@...com>,
	Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, fubar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: send IPv6 neighbor advertisement on failover

Well, I think the reason to send mulitple of them is identical.
If one is dropped due to network load, it won't happen; sending
multiple increases the odds of success.

DAD itself should update caches for neighboring nodes, so I
guess it makes sense that it isn't sending unsolicited NA's, But
that makes me think that the DAD retransmit counter is the one
you want. At least, the part of the DAD retransmit counter that is
for updating other nodes' caches. :-)

For MLD and IGMP, they were explicit SHOULD's-- I need to have
a look at ND RFC's to again to see what it says about it.

I don't think that alone is a reason to block the patch, but I also
don't think that updating neighbor caches with a new MAC address
is a unique requirement of bonding. Moving an address manually
ought to be identical in needs and behavior, as well as very-quick
reboots where the hardware changed. Thus, I don't think the knob
ought to be specific to bonding. I guess that leads to the suggestion
that you re-use the DAD counter for that.

References to MLD now and before are just me looking for an
analog to what ND should be doing. No new knob is definitely
required for them, since they already have this support for
unsolicited reports.

                                                +-DLS

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html