[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1223504558.22343.15.camel@w-sridhar2.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:22:38 -0700
From: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
To: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
Cc: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>,
Alex Sidorenko <alexandre.sidorenko@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, fubar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org,
Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: send IPv6 neighbor advertisement on failover
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 15:01 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
> David Stevens wrote:
> > Well, actually, it looks like I'm suggesting you to re-use something that
> > doesn't
> > exist. :-)
> >
> > MLD (and IGMP) has such a thing where unsolicited advertisements are sent
> > multiple times, with delays in between, to account for lossy networks
> > possibly
> > dropping the first one. There are configurable counts associated with
> > probes
> > and retransmit intervals for solicits, but I don't see the equivalent yet
> > for
> > unsolicited NA's.
>
> I don't see an equivalent either, since the only unsolicited NA the
> kernel sends is for DAD, which uses dad_transmits.
Doesn't DAD use neighbor solicitation rather than unsolicited NA?
Can we use NS in the bonding failover scenario too?
Thanks
Sridhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists