[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48EDA339.3040706@cdi.cz>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 08:22:49 +0200
From: Martin Devera <devik@....cz>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
CC: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Possible regression in HTB
>>
>> Simon, can you try to these things (separately):
>> a/ increase quantum to the first class (say 10x)
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Do you mean increase r2q ? If so, here are some results
no, no, add rather ... "quantum 50000" to the first class only
r2q affects computation for all classes
>> b/ set ceil=rate on all three classes
>
> This seems pretty close to the expected/ideal result.
>
> 10194: 496575074bits/s 496Mbits/s
> 10197: 96969861bits/s 96Mbits/s
> 10196: 96973002bits/s 96Mbits/s
> -----------------------------------
> total: 690517938bits/s 690Mbits/s
>
Hmm, it seems that problem is with drr loop or borrowing,
rate computation seems to work ok even in this corner case.
In any case from your other test follows that when NIC
throttles then HTB can't arrive at correct rates - I feel
this as HTB bug and add it to my (very long) todo list...
thanks, Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists