[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:56:12 -0700
From: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Cc: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>,
Alex Sidorenko <alexandre.sidorenko@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bonding: send IPv6 neighbor advertisement on
failover
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 12:29 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Brian Haley wrote:
> > Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >> As a semi-related question, what does IPv6 do if it receives a
> >> gratutitous NA, and finds a duplicate?
I think Jay was asking about the case where the target address in the NA
matches the address of the receiving interface. The RFCs don't describe
how to handle such a case and leave it to the implementation. Linux logs
a warning message and ignores such NA.
Thanks
Sridhar
> >
> > If a node has an IPv6 neighbor entry and receives an unsolicited NA it
> > will change it's state to stale, forcing a re-lookup on the next
> > transmit. An un-solicited NA will change the state to reachable.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You probably meant to say "solicited". Unsolicited NAs can only change
> the state to STALE.
>
> Also, the re-lookup will happen on a delay after the transmit.
>
> -vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists