netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp FRTO: in-order-only "TCP proxy" fragility workaround (fwd)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48f0ac73.050cc00a.02ca.437f@mx.google.com>
Date:	Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:38:54 -0300
From:	Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>
To:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp FRTO: in-order-only "TCP proxy" fragility
 workaround (fwd)

On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:27:50 +0300 (EEST)
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> wrote:

> This time there isn't any listening socket with queue to be accepted, not 
> connections. So it's not exactly the same situation on the server, I'm 
> sort of thinking that the accept() stuff we found earlier is just 
> coincidence, I guess it could as well hang somewhere else on other
> times.

	Ok, this was with 2.6.27-rc8. Now I'm using the final 2.6.27
version and, at least until now, no stall happened. 2.6.27 seems much
better than 2.6.25 and 2.6.26.

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html